Home

      HOME      CANDIDATES      NEWS       EVENTS       JOIN       SHOP       CONTACT       CONTRIBUTE


 Our Mission

 Issues

 Leadership

 VAN Access

 Clubs

 Press Room

 Fun Stuff

 Links

 Archives

 Candidates

 Donate












2008 General Election Constitutional Amendments Proposals


PROPOSED AMENDMENT #1
OFFICIAL TITLE: Relating to Property Rights Ineligible Aliens

PROPOSED BY: Florida Legislature
PURPOSE: To delete provisions in the Constitution that prohibit the ownership, inheritance, disposition, and possession of real estate land or buildings by foreigners not eligible for citizenship within the United States.

RECOMMENDATION: NONE-
It is up to each individual This is mostly an amendment to attempt to correct discriminations within the Constitution. It does have implications for immigration issues


PROPOSED AMENDMENT #2
OFFICIAL TITLE: Florida Marriage Protection Amendment

PROPOSED BY: Florida4Marriage.org
PURPOSE: To give permanence to current laws by placing within the constitution the definition of marriage as a legal union between only one man and one woman.

RECOMMENDATION: VOTE NO -
Whether you agree or disagree with the concept of marriage being sanctioned by homosexual couples this amendment requires a NO vote. The amendment as proposed is just a bad amendment It is poorly written with no thought as to possible future consequences The main reason for opposition would be the portion of the amendment that states "…marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof..." this in effect becomes an attack on women as laws relating to common law rights will be eliminated, in effect making women lesser before the law when asking for compensation for anytime spent in the extended company of a man. This provision also has major impacts on those couples forced by circumstances to share a home, but not marriage for fear of losing their pensions or other forms of income. They would be prohibited in the event of illness, death or other circumstances of providing comfort or assistance to their loved one as they would not be recognized by law, hospitals or even nursing homes as having any rights.


PROPOSED AMENDMENT #3
OFFICIAL TITLE: Changes and Improvements Not Affecting the Assessed Value of Residential Real Property

PROPOSED By: Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission
PURPOSE: To prohibit using wind resistance and renewable energy improvements to land to be used to increased the taxable value of property and to allow the Legislature to make the general laws concerning this issue.

RECOMMENDATION VOTE NO -
The constitution already allows local governments to provide such exemption for renewable energy sources. But the county government is only allowed to give exemption for the original cost and for no more than ten years. It would have been better if the Commission expanded the powers of local government instead of giving broad powers to the legislature. This is an effort to take away more local control from county governments. Southeastern counties such as Miami and Broward have high ad valorem taxes imposed by usually Democratic governing bodies. The Constitution prohibits the state from receiving funds from its budget from ad valorem taxes or making many laws affecting the same. Therefore ad valorem taxes should be of little interest to the legislature or this Commission. Passing this amendment will give the legislature more power of local taxes than they ever have had before. Republican interests that cannot get support within these highly Democratic counties are looking to the legislature and the constitution to impose their agendas. This is one of those efforts.


PROPOSED AMENDMENT #4
OFFICIAL TITLE: Property Tax Exemption of Perpetually Conserved Land: Classification and Assessment of Land Used for Conservation

PROPOSED BY: Florida Taxation and Budget Commission
PURPOSE: To give tax exemptions to land that is set aside for perpetual conservation based on character of use.

RECOMMENDATION: VOTE YES -
This is a duty of the legislature to define what land may be taxed. This amendment allows land that is being set aside for conservation by its character of use whether it is perpetually encumbered or not. Basically allows someone to set aside land for conservation and not have the land taxed at a higher rate as if the land was commercial or farm land. An example could be land on the coast that could be used for commercial fishing but the land owner wishes it to remain in its natural state. The land owner no longer has to pay commercial land taxes for land that will never be used for commercial purposes. It does take ad valorem taxes away from local governments.
A question does arise that if a land owner wishes to set aside land for perpetual conservation, why not deed it to the state with those stipulations and avoid paying any tax at all?


PROPOSED AMENDMENT #6
OFFICIAL TITLE: Assessment of Working Waterfront Property Based Upon Current Use

PROPOSED BY: Florida Taxation and Budget Commission
PURPOSE: To make sure waterfront land is taxed upon its current use instead of its possible use.

RECOMMENDATION: VOTE YES-
Local Counties have been taxing local commercial (working) waterfront property as if condominiums, high end hotels or high end housing were going to be built upon the land even though it is being used for commercial fishing purposes. This gives protection to the commercial fishing industry but does reduce county taxes.


PROPOSED AMENDMENT #8
OFFICIAL TITLE: Local Option Community College Funding

PROPOSED BY: Florida Taxation and Budget Commission
PURPOSE: To authorize the adoption of local sales taxes to fund community colleges.

RECOMMENDATION: None -
This gives local communities an extra option for funding local community colleges if the local electorate votes for the increase. The amendment makes it specific that the local electorate has to vote on the funding and the option tax must renewed every 5 years. It can help higher education in local areas not normally fully served by the state.
The flip side of this is that it moves the responsibility of funding our higher education from the state level to the local level. This seems to be an ongoing trend to remove tax burdens from Tallahassee to the counties.


PROPOSED AMENDMENT #5, 7 and 9 REMOVED

Printable File

(Created By Doug Courtney, Chair Florida Democratic Party Small County Coalition. These views do not necessarily represent recommendations by the Martin County Democratic Executive Committee.)


footer


BACK TO TOP
HOME